Timing of Initiation of Renal-Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury
New England Journal of Medicine, 2020 · International, multicenter, randomized controlled trial — the largest RRT-timing trial to date.
Clinical question
In critically ill adults with severe AKI, does an accelerated RRT initiation strategy improve 90-day survival compared with a standard, watchful-waiting strategy?
What the trial found
In the largest and most rigorously powered trial of RRT timing to date, an accelerated initiation strategy did not improve 90-day survival compared with watchful waiting, and watchful waiting safely avoided RRT altogether in a large minority of patients.
Current guideline position
The weight of evidence (AKIKI, IDEAL-ICU, STARRT-AKI, all neutral or favoring watchful waiting, against ELAIN's isolated positive result) supports initiating RRT based on a clinical indication rather than a fixed AKI stage — this evidence predates and is expected to inform the still-in-draft KDIGO 2026 RRT timing guidance.
Clinical interpretation
STARRT-AKI is the strongest single piece of evidence against routine early/accelerated RRT initiation in AKI without a specific indication — it reinforces AKIKI and IDEAL-ICU, and its size and rigor argue against generalizing ELAIN's earlier, smaller, single-center positive result to general practice.
Limitations
Sepsis-AKI microcirculatory decoupling, KDIGO staging, Furosemide Stress Test (FST), urine microscopy, and the AEIOU dialysis threshold framework.
Principles of convection vs diffusion, filtration fraction, delivered effluent dosing (20–25 mL/kg/h), Regional Citrate Anticoagulation, and citrate toxicity.