Vasopressin versus Norepinephrine Infusion in Patients with Septic Shock
New England Journal of Medicine, 2008 · Multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial.
Clinical question
In septic shock already requiring norepinephrine, does adding low-dose vasopressin instead of continuing to titrate norepinephrine alone improve mortality?
What the trial found
Adding vasopressin to norepinephrine did not significantly reduce 28-day mortality compared with norepinephrine alone in the overall trial population. A pre-specified subgroup analysis suggested a possible mortality benefit in patients with less severe shock (lower baseline norepinephrine dose), but subgroup findings in a formally neutral trial are hypothesis-generating, not confirmatory.
Current guideline position
The 2026 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guideline conditionally suggests adding vasopressin in patients with escalating norepinephrine doses, consistent with VASST's design (add-on, not replacement) but without claiming a proven mortality benefit.
Clinical interpretation
VASST is the main trial-level basis for using vasopressin as an add-on agent in septic shock rather than as a norepinephrine replacement, but it did not establish a mortality benefit for the overall population — the rationale for adding it (reducing norepinephrine dose requirements, catecholamine-sparing) is physiologic and practical rather than a demonstrated survival benefit.
Limitations