Transfusion of Plasma, Platelets, and Red Blood Cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 Ratio and Mortality in Patients With Severe Trauma
JAMA, 2015 · Multicenter (12 Level I trauma centers, North America), randomized controlled trial.
Clinical question
In severe trauma requiring massive transfusion, does a 1:1:1 plasma:platelet:RBC transfusion ratio improve survival compared with a 1:1:2 ratio?
What the trial found
A 1:1:1 transfusion ratio did not significantly reduce overall mortality compared with 1:1:2, but did reduce early death from exsanguination and improved the rate of achieving hemostasis.
Current guideline position
Balanced (near 1:1:1) transfusion ratios are now standard practice in most massive transfusion protocols for trauma, based substantially on this trial's secondary findings.
Clinical interpretation
PROPPR is the primary trial basis for balanced-ratio massive transfusion protocols, even though its overall mortality result was neutral — the reduction in early exsanguination and improved hemostasis are read as clinically meaningful secondary findings, though this requires interpreting a non-primary endpoint as practice-changing, which is a real limitation of the trial's design as basis for the current standard.
Limitations
The trauma lethal diamond (hypothermia, acidosis, coagulopathy, hypocalcemia), 1:1:1 massive transfusion (PROPPR trial), early TXA (CRASH-2), and TEG/ROTEM algorithms.
Patient-specific RBC transfusion thresholds, current platelet/procedural thresholds, plasma/cryoprecipitate use, and the TRALI vs TACO diagnostic matrix.